↓ Skip to main content

NMDA Receptor Dependent Long-term Potentiation in Chronic Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Neurochemical Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
NMDA Receptor Dependent Long-term Potentiation in Chronic Pain
Published in
Neurochemical Research, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11064-018-2614-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu-Hui Li, Hui-Hui Miao, Min Zhuo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Unspecified 2 13%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 25%
Unspecified 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Other 2 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#9,817,955
of 12,819,958 outputs
Outputs from Neurochemical Research
#896
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,529
of 262,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurochemical Research
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.