↓ Skip to main content

Editorial for an official journal of the American association of pharmaceutical scientists

Overview of attention for article published in AAPS Open, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Editorial for an official journal of the American association of pharmaceutical scientists
Published in
AAPS Open, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s41120-015-0001-y
Authors

Christopher M. Riley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#5,726,366
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from AAPS Open
#6
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,980
of 386,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AAPS Open
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them