| Title |
The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business Ethics, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4 |
| Authors |
Kent Walker, Fang Wan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 874 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 864 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 144 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 124 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 96 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 5% |
| Researcher | 43 | 5% |
| Other | 126 | 14% |
| Unknown | 294 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 287 | 33% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 68 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 62 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 4% |
| Engineering | 20 | 2% |
| Other | 91 | 10% |
| Unknown | 310 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,664,295
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#780
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,987
of 240,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.