↓ Skip to main content

A case of panuveitis with hypopyon due to presumed ocular leishmaniasis in a HIV patient

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
A case of panuveitis with hypopyon due to presumed ocular leishmaniasis in a HIV patient
Published in
Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12348-014-0021-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Couture, Rupesh Agrawal, Kate Woods, Diana Lockwood, Carlos E Pavesio, Peter K F Addison

Abstract

Post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis is a well-known immunologic cutaneous reaction. There are few case reports of ocular leishmaniasis. It is a sight-threatening condition that needs to be rapidly recognized and treated to avoid permanent visual loss. Ocular leishmaniasis panuveitis can present with severe inflammation in patients with highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART)-induced immune reconstitution syndrome. A case of a 40-year-old man, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive on HAART, with a presumed diagnosis of ocular leishmaniasis, is presented. He had a past history of visceral leishmaniasis and was referred to the uveitis service with rapidly worsening panuveitis and counting fingers vision in both eyes. On empirical anti-leishmania therapy and systemic steroids, the visual acuity of the left eye improved to 6/9 but remained poor in the right eye. Based on the medical history, improvement with therapy and the exclusion of other common infections, a presumed diagnosis of ocular leishmaniasis-related panuveitis was made. A major immune reaction against lingering parasites may play a key role in the pathogenesis of this sight-threatening and rapidly progressive condition. Both the infection and the immune reaction should be treated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,295,501
of 22,832,057 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#138
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,185
of 236,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,832,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.