↓ Skip to main content

Ecological assessment of coal mine and metal mine drainage in South Korea using Daphnia magna bioassay

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Ecological assessment of coal mine and metal mine drainage in South Korea using Daphnia magna bioassay
Published in
SpringerPlus, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1311-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sang-Ho Lee, Injeong Kim, Kyoung-Woong Kim, Byung-Tae Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 23%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Environmental Science 7 15%
Engineering 7 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 9 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#992
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,714
of 286,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#68
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.