| Title |
Timetable for oral prevention in childhood—developing dentition and oral habits: a current opinion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40510-015-0107-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandra Majorana, Elena Bardellini, Francesca Amadori, Giulio Conti, Antonella Polimeni |
| Abstract |
As most of the etiologic factors of malocclusion are of genetic origin and thus cannot be prevented, environmental causative factors have become the focus for correction. Early interception of oral habits may be an important step in order to prevent occlusal disturbances in children. The identification of an abnormal habit and the assessment of its potential immediate and long-term effects on the dentition and potentially on the craniofacial complex should be made at an early stage. This paper focuses on the most common oral habits influencing dentofacial growth in childhood and management of these habits in the developing dentition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Austria | 1 | 17% |
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 66 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 54% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 68 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,047,316
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#42
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,903
of 296,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them