↓ Skip to main content

A morphological and geometric method for estimating the selectivity of gill nets

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
A morphological and geometric method for estimating the selectivity of gill nets
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11160-018-9534-1
Authors

Feodor Lobyrev, Matthew J. Hoffman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Mathematics 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,398,101
of 12,808,036 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries
#122
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,452
of 266,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology & Fisheries
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,808,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.