↓ Skip to main content

Putting a bit into the polo-box domain of polo-like kinase 1

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Analytical Science and Technology , October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Putting a bit into the polo-box domain of polo-like kinase 1
Published in
Journal of Analytical Science and Technology , October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40543-015-0069-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung-Eun Park, Tae-Sung Kim, Lingjun Meng, Jeong K. Bang, Bo Y. Kim, Kyung S. Lee

Abstract

Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) plays key roles in regulating various mitotic processes that are critical for cellular proliferation. A growing body of evidence suggests that Plk1 overexpression is tightly associated with the development of human cancers. Interestingly, various types of cancer cells are shown to be addicted to a high level of Plk1, and the reversal of Plk1 addiction appears to be an effective strategy for selectively killing cancer cells, but not normal cells. Therefore, Plk1 is considered an attractive anticancer drug target. Over the years, a large number of inhibitors that target the catalytic activity of Plk1 have been developed. However, these inhibitors exhibit significant levels of cross-reactivity with related kinases, including Plk2 and Plk3. Consequently, as an alternative approach for developing anti-Plk1 therapeutics, substantial effort is under way to develop inhibitors that target the C-terminal protein-protein interaction domain of Plk1, called the polo-box domain (PBD). In this communication, I will discuss the pros and cons of targeting the PBD in comparison to those of targeting the ATP-binding site within the kinase domain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2015.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Analytical Science and Technology
#30
of 82 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,294
of 291,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Analytical Science and Technology
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.