| Title |
The U.S. food–energy–water system: A blueprint to fill the mesoscale gap for science and decision-making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-018-1077-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Lant, Jacopo Baggio, Megan Konar, Alfonso Mejia, Benjamin Ruddell, Richard Rushforth, John L. Sabo, Tara J. Troy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 21 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#13,625,040
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,352
of 1,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,746
of 327,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.