Title |
Local root status: a neglected bio-factor that regulates the home-field advantage of leaf litter decomposition
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant and Soil, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11104-018-3757-8 |
Authors |
Kai Tian, Xiangshi Kong, Jianguo Gao, Yanyan Jia, Hong Lin, Zaihua He, Yanli Ji, Zhanlin Bei, Xingjun Tian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 31% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Materials Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,128,890
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#606
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,291
of 332,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.