Background: ~50% of published psych articles with stats have at least one p-value that is inconsistent with their degrees of freedom and test statistic, and in ~12.5% of articles this may affect conclusions about statistical significance. See: https://t.c
RT @Sean__Last: A table of similar research, seems safe to say that about half of psych articles report a set of statistics that are mathem…
@goodthruo I’m working with the same dataset used in this paper - it’s all articles published in APA journals 1985-2013. https://t.co/1dWbFR9IJA
RT @Sean__Last: A table of similar research, seems safe to say that about half of psych articles report a set of statistics that are mathem…
RT @Sean__Last: A table of similar research, seems safe to say that about half of psych articles report a set of statistics that are mathem…
RT @Sean__Last: A table of similar research, seems safe to say that about half of psych articles report a set of statistics that are mathem…
A table of similar research, seems safe to say that about half of psych articles report a set of statistics that are mathematically inconsistent with each other and medicine may not be much better. https://t.co/vQOr9cOE4k https://t.co/KgIy1jqnIf
@ProfPaulRalph Very interesting findings! Are you going to publish this? This reminds me eerily of similar problems in psychology: https://t.co/dHcAiLW9Tz https://t.co/4znYNCnU1l
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) | SpringerLink https://t.co/rfrErHyQon
@richarddmorey @IrisVanRooij @seriousstats With statcheck we don't find all results, but we do cite sources that report NHST prevalence; https://t.co/IVHfXsIgjE first sentence. We also report changes in detected statistics over the years, but again: this i
📕Today’s #recommendedreading is " The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology”. 🔎Find out more here ⬇️https://t.co/L0ilpaxb08
@Myrdin_Emrys @pablo_gps Pues cada vez se reanaliza más. Hay proyectos enormes de data mining, o de meta-ciencia. Mira por ejemplo: https://t.co/NMnMrDe8jc
@R__INDEX Was typing on phone so kept it brief. I simply meant studies that focus on how we do science. For eg, work by people like @JelteWicherts https://t.co/udg7Ewalee and @MicheleNuijten https://t.co/jJCfOZuShx. Many other eg's of course.
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
[5: tools/resources to assess reliability] Statcheck: Shiny - https://t.co/adCUuimvOF Article - https://t.co/NU8R87jxe0 @MicheleNuijten etal.
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
Good point on data and analysis RT @ronnyk
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
RT @ronnyk: We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsiste…
We want to be data driven, but is the data trustworthy? Some great examples of common errors everyone can check: 1. Inconsistencies in confusion matrices: https://t.co/Kim0OQX7CY @ProfMShepperd 2. Statistical errors: https://t.co/4Kh0SBtpJy @MicheleNuij
RT @pash22: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) https://t.co/D1utUnmr6b via @chartgerink et al
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) https://t.co/D1utUnmr6b via @chartgerink et al
@FantasticMrLink @salonium Certainly seems to be true for psychology, where big mistakes are more likely to occur when results are reported as significant than the other way around: https://t.co/jTgYrIweGy
#3: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) https://t.co/rbg5CM53Um 1/2 of papers looked at had errors, "One in eight papers contained a grossly inconsistent p-value that may have affected the statistical conclusion"
RT @RetractionWatch: One in 8 psychology studies "contains a gross inconsistency that affects the statistical conclusion" @MicheleNuijten h…
Rereading @MicheleNuijten's article for my class: "JPSP showed the highest prevalence of articles with at least one inconsistency (57.6 %)..JPSP also had the highest percentage of articles with at least one gross inconsistency (15.8 %)" https://t.co/Np4kuQ
RT @RetractionWatch: One in 8 psychology studies "contains a gross inconsistency that affects the statistical conclusion" @MicheleNuijten h…
RT @RetractionWatch: One in 8 psychology studies "contains a gross inconsistency that affects the statistical conclusion" @MicheleNuijten h…
RT @LorneJCampbell: "...we found that half of all published psychology papers that use NHST contained at least one p-value that was inconsi…
"...we found that half of all published psychology papers that use NHST contained at least one p-value that was inconsistent with its test statistic and degrees of freedom." https://t.co/jJCfOZdgSX
@prokraustinator The goal isn't to assess significance - exact p-values combined with the test statistic & DF allow you to confirm that the test result is correct - reporting errors leading to incorrect p-values are common as shown here: https://t.co/m
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) Nuijten et al #BRM https://t.co/o2kHB2f0SK
“This study documents reporting errors in a sample of over 250,000 p-values ” “we found that half of all published psychology papers that use NHST contained at least one p-value that was inconsistent with its test statistic and degrees of freedom ” https
RT @patilindrajeets: In a limited context, this also takes care of statistical inconsistencies often observed in the psych literature (à la…
In a limited context, this also takes care of statistical inconsistencies often observed in the psych literature (à la @MicheleNuijten: https://t.co/3y8YnGA0vW). If stats are embedded in the figures, no need to copy-paste the results which reduce chances o
RT @kenmetrics: 30年近くにわたる心理学論文中で報告されたp値、のべ25万件(!)が、論文中のほかの情報と整合的かをチェックし、実は間違いが多々あることを報告した研究。このためにテキスト処理パッケージを開発して使う、というアイディアがおもしろい。 https:/…
p-valueちゃんとチェックしないとね https://t.co/KxY7sCN9zv
RT @RetractionWatch: One in 8 psychology studies "contains a gross inconsistency that affects the statistical conclusion" @MicheleNuijten h…
https://t.co/NEX7A9uBcp The analysis of 250,000 p-values published in 8 major psychology journals from 1985 to 2013 revealed half of them …
Authenticity, yes. Accuracy, no. https://t.co/u8B9kVdpkc https://t.co/UJrxzpMvjw
@lakens have a look at "R package statcheck (v1.0.1)" https://t.co/jhfHLPJuKH It is not exactly what you want, but maybe a start.
RT @msebastian_psi: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). https://t.co/4O0UH3bHEt
RT @msebastian_psi: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). https://t.co/4O0UH3bHEt
RT @msebastian_psi: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). https://t.co/4O0UH3bHEt
RT @msebastian_psi: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). https://t.co/4O0UH3bHEt
RT @msebastian_psi: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). https://t.co/4O0UH3bHEt
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013). https://t.co/4O0UH3bHEt
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
RT @rmflight: @statnews should check out Nat Sel of Bad Sci https://t.co/irTEq52qY1 Incent for Sci https://t.co/QANXzoNkLv https://t.co/…
RT @rmflight: @statnews should check out Nat Sel of Bad Sci https://t.co/irTEq52qY1 Incent for Sci https://t.co/QANXzoNkLv https://t.co/…
@statnews should check out Nat Sel of Bad Sci https://t.co/irTEq52qY1 Incent for Sci https://t.co/QANXzoNkLv https://t.co/JpqwKUwTTO https://t.co/DeAgkRX4CN
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
@theeffortreport Incent for Science https://t.co/QANXzoNkLv Prev of Stat Errors https://t.co/JpqwKUwTTO 2/2
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
Statcheck paper now out https://t.co/RArB6mol0A
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
RT @MicheleNuijten: The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
The #statcheck paper finally in print! https://t.co/qkxbIAxDww
@moritzkoerber @RetractionWatch Rates of false pos+negs of statcheck is not entirely "unclear" (https://t.co/4SWiqQACHw), so DGPs claim >
Psy authors! Check your Likert scale data with GRIM https://t.co/nmOpfnX2p2 and stats with StatCheck. Then submit. https://t.co/XhR2bCfHhQ
Загвараа яаж зохиосноос шалтгаалах үе ч бий шүү. Гэхдээ үзнээ https://t.co/XTLxoKlvI2
Загвараа яаж зохиосноос шалтгаалах үе ч бий шүү. Гэхдээ үзнээ https://t.co/uBjF3h0K7e
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) https://t.co/KFU5egzqlV
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology: 1985-2013. https://t.co/lc7a1oVDTZ
@deevybee @richarddmorey @sampendu @PubPeer @chartgerink They have. The small validation study is in Appendix A: https://t.co/C3MQ7pWD1i
@richarddmorey @sampendu @PubPeer @deevybee @chartgerink There is also a brief validation study reported here https://t.co/LFjEB2povX
RT @MicheleNuijten: "The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)": https://t.co/nccHPK62MG Sneak preview: http…
@cMadan @Neuro_Skeptic @MicheleNuijten @jayvanbavel Yes, you are correct! Sorry. Thought you linked to https://t.co/nvyEDj1lHh
RT @drElsje: Disturbing: 1/2 of psychology papers include errors #pvalues https://t.co/wZNYZtRIhj Phew, mine belongs to other 1/2 https://t…
RT @drElsje: Disturbing: 1/2 of psychology papers include errors #pvalues https://t.co/wZNYZtRIhj Phew, mine belongs to other 1/2 https://t…
Disturbing: 1/2 of psychology papers include errors #pvalues https://t.co/wZNYZtRIhj Phew, mine belongs to other 1/2 https://t.co/SPcknquOmN
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) https://t.co/Mbq5pk7G97
50% of 250k stats tests in psychol jnls wrong! Can't just be psychology - valuable tool for editors and skeptics https://t.co/qs861WoHUE
Prévalence erreurs statistiques dans les études scientifiques en psychologie, en libre accès:https://t.co/HhqjwOryXo https://t.co/vMBMXJ5XW7
“The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in #psychology (1985–2013)” #openAccess https://t.co/OrQcfHeIil #science #philSci #cogSci
RT @NikosNtoumanis: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013); https://t.co/ktv7hnvzlB
RT @NikosNtoumanis: The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013); https://t.co/ktv7hnvzlB
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013); https://t.co/ktv7hnvzlB
Whoops. Spotting & fixing errors of statistical testing in research https://t.co/mdV2iUAVMo
RT @kenmetrics: 30年近くにわたる心理学論文中で報告されたp値、のべ25万件(!)が、論文中のほかの情報と整合的かをチェックし、実は間違いが多々あることを報告した研究。このためにテキスト処理パッケージを開発して使う、というアイディアがおもしろい。 https:/…
RT @russpoldrack: High rate of statistical errors in psych papers https://t.co/bYrx6hMWPD - solution: run statcheck pre-submission! https:…
RT @kenmetrics: 30年近くにわたる心理学論文中で報告されたp値、のべ25万件(!)が、論文中のほかの情報と整合的かをチェックし、実は間違いが多々あることを報告した研究。このためにテキスト処理パッケージを開発して使う、というアイディアがおもしろい。 https:/…
RT @Pascallisch: Half of psych papers doing NHST report p-values inconsistent with test statistic or df. https://t.co/jdmSIlEvDm
RT @Pascallisch: Half of psych papers doing NHST report p-values inconsistent with test statistic or df. https://t.co/jdmSIlEvDm
RT @Pascallisch: Half of psych papers doing NHST report p-values inconsistent with test statistic or df. https://t.co/jdmSIlEvDm
RT @Pascallisch: Half of psych papers doing NHST report p-values inconsistent with test statistic or df. https://t.co/jdmSIlEvDm
RT @Pascallisch: Half of psych papers doing NHST report p-values inconsistent with test statistic or df. https://t.co/jdmSIlEvDm
RT @Pascallisch: Half of psych papers doing NHST report p-values inconsistent with test statistic or df. https://t.co/jdmSIlEvDm
RT @JelteWicherts: About 70% of articles in psychology use NHST Nearly 50% show errors in reporting of p-values https://t.co/28CGHlAX7w htt…
I'm reading prevalence of stat errors in '85 https://t.co/jkPBm6qKdY #phack #pubbias