↓ Skip to main content

Proton-pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: an update meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Proton-pump inhibitors and risk of fractures: an update meta-analysis
Published in
Osteoporosis International, October 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00198-015-3365-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Zhou, Y. Huang, H. Li, W. Sun, J. Liu

Abstract

To identify the relationship between proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the risk of fracture, we conducted an update meta-analysis of observational studies. Results showed that PPI use was associated with a modestly increased risk of hip, spine, and any-site fracture. Many studies have investigated the association of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) with fracture risk, but the results have been inconsistent. To evaluate this question, we performed a meta-analysis of relevant observational studies. A systematic literature search up to February 2015 was performed in PubMed. We combined relative risks (RRs) for fractures using random-effects models and conducted subgroup and stratified analyses. Eighteen studies involving a total of 244,109 fracture cases were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed that PPI use could moderately increase the risk of hip fracture [RR = 1.26, 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) 1.16-1.36]. There was statistically significant heterogeneity among studies (p < 0.001; I (2) = 71.9 %). After limiting to cohort studies, there was also a moderate increase in hip fracture risk without evidence of study heterogeneity. Pooling revealed that short-term use (<1 year) and longer use (>1 year) were similarly associated with increased risk of hip fracture. Furthermore, a moderately increased risk of spine (RR = 1.58, 95 % CI 1.38-1.82) and any-site fracture (RR = 1.33, 95 % CI 1.15-1.54) was also found among PPI users. In this update meta-analysis of observational studies, PPI use modestly increased the risk of hip, spine, and any-site fracture, but no evidence of duration effect in subgroup analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 18 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#724,617
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#80
of 3,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,646
of 291,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.