↓ Skip to main content

Enzymatic and non-enzymatic isolation systems for adipose tissue-derived cells: current state of the art

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 189)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Enzymatic and non-enzymatic isolation systems for adipose tissue-derived cells: current state of the art
Published in
Cell Regeneration, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13619-015-0020-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleni Oberbauer, Carolin Steffenhagen, Christoph Wurzer, Christian Gabriel, Heinz Redl, Susanne Wolbank

Abstract

In the past decade, adipose tissue became a highly interesting source of adult stem cells for plastic surgery and regenerative medicine. The isolated stromal vascular fraction (SVF) is a heterogeneous cell population including the adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASC), which showed regenerative potential in several clinical studies and trials. SVF should be provided in a safe and reproducible manner in accordance with current good manufacturing practices (cGMP). To ensure highest possible safety for patients, a precisely defined procedure with a high-quality control is required. Hence, an increasing number of adipose tissue-derived cell isolation systems have been developed. These systems aim for a closed, sterile, and safe isolation process limiting donor variations, risk for contaminations, and unpredictability of the cell material. To isolate SVF from adipose tissue, enzymes such as collagenase are used. Alternatively, in order to avoid enzymes, isolation systems using physical forces are available. Here, we provide an overview of known existing enzymatic and non-enzymatic adipose tissue-derived cell isolation systems, which are patented, published, or already on the market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Master 25 12%
Other 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 46 21%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 13%
Engineering 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 56 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,190,179
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#6
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,666
of 286,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them