| Title |
The outline of the 2011 eruption at Shinmoe-dake (Kirishima), Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.5047/eps.2013.03.016 |
| Authors |
Setsuya Nakada, Masashi Nagai, Takayuki Kaneko, Yuki Suzuki, Fukashi Maeno |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 44 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 32 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Energy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,156,773
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#274
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,224
of 197,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them