↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient as a predictor of volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing healthy adults

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient as a predictor of volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing healthy adults
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40635-018-0187-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

María C. Arango-Granados, Virginia Zarama Córdoba, Andrés M. Castro Llanos, Luis A. Bustamante Cristancho

Abstract

Methods to guide fluid therapy in spontaneously breathing patients are scarce. No studies have reported the accuracy of end-tidal CO2 (ET-CO2) to predict volume responsiveness in these patients. We sought to evaluate the ET-CO2 gradient (ΔET-CO2) after a passive leg rise (PLR) maneuver to predict volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing healthy adults. We conducted a prospective study in healthy adult human volunteers. A PLR maneuver was performed and cardiac output (CO) was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. ET-CO2 was measured with non-invasive capnographs. Volume responsiveness was defined as an increase in cardiac output (CO) > 12% at 90 s after PLR. Of the 50 volunteers, 32% were classified as volume responders. In this group, the left ventricle outflow tract velocity time integral (VTILVOT) increased from 17.9 ± 3.0 to 20.4 ± 3.4 (p = 0.0004), CO increased from 4.4 ± 1.5 to 5.5 ± 1.6 (p = 0.0), and ET-CO2 rose from 32 ± 4.84 to 33 ± 5.07 (p = 0.135). Within the entire population, PLR-induced percentage ∆CO was not correlated with percentage ∆ET-CO2 (R2 = 0.13; p = 0.36). The area under the receiver operating curve for the ability of ET-CO2 to discriminate responders from non-responders was of 0.67 ± 0.09 (95% CI 0.498-0.853). A ΔET-CO2 ≥ 2 mmHg had a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 97.06%, positive likelihood ratio of 17.00, negative likelihood ratio of 0.51, positive predictive value of 88.9%, and negative predictive value of 80.5% for the prediction of fluid responsiveness. ΔET-CO2 after a PLR has limited utility to discriminate responders from non-responders among healthy spontaneously breathing adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 19%
Librarian 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,844,245
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#287
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,000
of 333,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.