| Title |
Review of visual odometry: types, approaches, challenges, and applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
SpringerPlus, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40064-016-3573-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohammad O. A. Aqel, Mohammad H. Marhaban, M. Iqbal Saripan, Napsiah Bt. Ismail |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 444 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 442 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 93 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 135 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 180 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 91 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 4 | <1% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | <1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 146 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,845,801
of 23,098,660 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#233
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,510
of 314,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#20
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,098,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.