↓ Skip to main content

The Suitability of 3D Data: 3D Digitisation of Human Remains

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeologies, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
The Suitability of 3D Data: 3D Digitisation of Human Remains
Published in
Archaeologies, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11759-018-9347-9
Authors

Suzanna White, Cara Hirst, Sian E. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 6 16%
Professor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Arts and Humanities 6 16%
Engineering 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,377,101
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Archaeologies
#53
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,196
of 342,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeologies
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.