| Title |
Data-Driven Correlation Analysis Between Observed 3D Fatigue-Crack Path and Computed Fields from High-Fidelity, Crystal-Plasticity, Finite-Element Simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JOM, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11837-018-2884-2 |
| Authors |
Kyle D. Pierson, Jacob D. Hochhalter, Ashley D. Spear |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 12 | 31% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,374,271
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#1,207
of 1,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,474
of 331,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#9
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,591 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.