↓ Skip to main content

Bone marrow-derived versus adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing: value and route of administration

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Tissue Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Bone marrow-derived versus adipose-derived stem cells in wound healing: value and route of administration
Published in
Cell & Tissue Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00441-018-2879-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basma Emad Aboulhoda, Shereen Abd el Fattah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Physics and Astronomy 2 25%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2018.
All research outputs
#10,121,489
of 13,253,522 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Tissue Research
#1,064
of 1,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,626
of 267,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Tissue Research
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,253,522 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,608 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.