↓ Skip to main content

Defining the learning curve of point-of-care ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement by emergency physicians

Overview of attention for article published in The Ultrasound Journal, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Defining the learning curve of point-of-care ultrasound for confirming endotracheal tube placement by emergency physicians
Published in
The Ultrasound Journal, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13089-015-0031-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan Chenkin, Colin J. L. McCartney, Tomislav Jelic, Michael Romano, Claire Heslop, Glen Bandiera

Abstract

Unrecognized esophageal intubations are associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality. No single confirmatory device has been shown to be 100 % accurate at ruling out esophageal intubations in the emergency department. Recent studies have demonstrated that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may be a useful adjunct for confirming endotracheal tube placement; however, the amount of practice required to become proficient at this technique is unclear. The purpose of this study is to determine the amount of practice required by emergency physicians to become proficient at interpreting ultrasound video clips of esophageal and endotracheal intubations. Emergency physicians and emergency medicine residents completed a baseline interpretation test followed by a 10 min online tutorial. They then interpreted POCUS clips of esophageal and endotracheal intubations in a randomly selected order. If an incorrect response was provided, the participant completed another practice session with feedback. This process continued until they correctly interpreted ten consecutive ultrasound clips. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Of the 87 eligible physicians, 66 (75.9 %) completed the study. The mean score on the baseline test was 42.9 % (SD 32.7 %). After the tutorial, 90.9 % (60/66) of the participants achieved proficiency after one practice attempt and 100 % achieved proficiency after two practice attempts. Six intubation ultrasound clips were misinterpreted, for a total error rate of 0.9 % (6/684). Overall, the participants had a sensitivity of 98.3 % (95 % CI 96.3-99.4 %) and specificity of 100 % (95 % CI 98.9-100 %) for detecting correct tube location. Scans were interpreted within an average of 4 s (SD 2.9 s) of the intubation. After a brief online tutorial and only two practice attempts, emergency physicians were able to quickly and accurately interpret ultrasound intubation clips of esophageal and endotracheal intubations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 13 17%
Other 11 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 23%