Evaluations of projects and applicants were (very) highly correlated in @ERC_Research data, showing that panelists do not distinguish these dimensions when presented as one package https://t.co/KuW41QHJPh (4/n)
The role of linguistics in grant decision making. https://t.co/wC0F3MOyhj https://t.co/Qcy6h8DBAX
RT @ekulczycki: @d_galasinski @adamgendzwill Mi jest bardzo blisko stanowiska @JerzyOrsel, mimo iż to dzięki grantom zbudowałem grupę badaw…
@adamgendzwill @karolinakremens @rkaminski85 @PMWojtulek @AndrzejWNowak1 @JerzyOrsel Tu odp. @ekulczycki z sasiednego watku.
@d_galasinski @adamgendzwill Mi jest bardzo blisko stanowiska @JerzyOrsel, mimo iż to dzięki grantom zbudowałem grupę badawczą. Co do literatury: klasyczną pozycją w tym zakresie jest praca @mlamont6 „How Professors Think” (https://t.co/k1Nt6cbZcD). Poleca
I don't know if I'm more interested in this for the linguistic analysis using #LIWC or for the unsurprising result (tldr: "grant reviewers are generally cautious"). It's based on https://t.co/U4k0ZQPaZC
RT @eu_granted: @annasvrn Concerning underlying patterns: here is a recent study that examines grant decision-making by analysing (peer) re…
RT @eu_granted: What distinguishes a successful from a non-successful grant application✍️🤔💰🤷♀️? #researchgrants #researchcareers #peerevie…
What distinguishes a successful from a non-successful grant application✍️🤔💰🤷♀️? #researchgrants #researchcareers #peereview #linguistics #decisionmaking @VUamsterdam @joan_research Find out here➡️https://t.co/JBvAwnDxDp
@annasvrn Concerning underlying patterns: here is a recent study that examines grant decision-making by analysing (peer) review reports https://t.co/JBvAwnDxDp
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
Look @ibartomeus 😣
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
RT @ibartomeus: "...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain…
"...the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas that may be in the proposal" Studying grant decision making: https://t.co/IdDsI2JP0d
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
Análisis lingüistico en los informes para las becas ERC. Sugiere, entre otros, que los revisores, más que buscar lo "groundbreaking", se dedican a buscar defectos o debilidades.
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
RT @lutzbornmann: ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain g…
ERC panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas that may be in the proposal https://t.co/8F0WZbCDye
After ten years the non-granted had performed better in most indicators we used. For example, on average they had a higher number of top-cited papers than the granted applicants. This means very qualified false negatives occur https://t.co/yIctKZ9hOt https
Study suggests that Grant Panels have a negative attitude: trying to find weak parts in applications to justify rejecting them rather than trying to find the breakthrough ideas in an application. https://t.co/eHA3NIYCFN
This comes at a good time, as I'm preparing my first large grant application.
Study of the grant decision-making: "the panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas that may be in the proposal" https://t.co/o9bCb0EDYo
RT @jeroenschepers: The strong get stronger, the weak get weaker... Grant decisions panels do not distinguish between researcher past perfo…
RT @jeroenschepers: The strong get stronger, the weak get weaker... Grant decisions panels do not distinguish between researcher past perfo…
RT @jeroenschepers: The strong get stronger, the weak get weaker... Grant decisions panels do not distinguish between researcher past perfo…
The strong get stronger, the weak get weaker... Grant decisions panels do not distinguish between researcher past performance and promising new research ideas. Very troublesome & once again showing that the academic grant system does not work! https://
Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports https://t.co/1j7OVxGNwT ht @NicolaiFoss
@bradpwyble @andpru I see your point is valid for some people but I won't generalize. There're shallow/biased reviews in the current system https://t.co/CXl3HcrAgm https://t.co/3ZQDhV61xx
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @wduyck: Nog een probleem in evaluatie onderzoeksfinanciering: “panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points,…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @wduyck: Nog een probleem in evaluatie onderzoeksfinanciering: “panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points,…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
Nog een probleem in evaluatie onderzoeksfinanciering: “panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on the high-gain ideas in the proposal. This may result in sub-optimal selections, in low predictive validity, and bias.
RT @NicolaiFoss: Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on fin…
Review panels do what too many reviewers also do: "rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas" https://t.co/YUHu0uBzX8 @Keld_Laursen @agambardella61
Suboptimal selection, low predictive validity, and biases of peer review: "...panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas that may be in the proposal"https://t.co/
Here is what peer review gets you. #CIHR https://t.co/9bHM4BBI31
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
RT @ChristineTlkn: What's new.... @FSW_VU https://t.co/4C3a8yZpGn
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @KrzychJask: Studying #grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of #review reports #bias #ERC https://t.co/22QPkFeQkA https://t.co/D…
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @KrzychJask: Studying #grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of #review reports #bias #ERC https://t.co/22QPkFeQkA https://t.co/D…
What's new.... @FSW_VU
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
RT @ChoroszewiczM: And for many great applicants, it takes often from half to a year of work on the application - time away from research.…
Studying #grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of #review reports #bias #ERC https://t.co/22QPkFeQkA https://t.co/DRuPDPmENB
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
This is not my experience at all. https://t.co/bw7JvjQSNX
RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B