RT @ogandril: This is so true! https://t.co/vElQcTEF0B
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
RT @ChoroszewiczM: And for many great applicants, it takes often from half to a year of work on the application - time away from research.…
RT @ChoroszewiczM: And for many great applicants, it takes often from half to a year of work on the application - time away from research.…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
And for many great applicants, it takes often from half to a year of work on the application - time away from research.
This is so true!
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @Research_Voice: Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
RT @RetractionWatch: Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk…
Peer review "panels focus on rejecting the applications by searching for weak points, and not on finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas that may be in the proposal. This may easily result in sub-optimal selections...and in bias." https://t.co
RT @Research_Voice: Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’…
RT @KropTor: Menos de 10 minutos para discutir el futuro de una persona, así todo se reduce a sumar los #impactfacotrs. La #gestión de la #…
RT @KropTor: Menos de 10 minutos para discutir el futuro de una persona, así todo se reduce a sumar los #impactfacotrs. La #gestión de la #…
RT @Research_Voice: Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’…
RT @Research_Voice: Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’…
RT @LJ_Griffiths: Months of planning and writing...for a 10-minute decision. No pressure to get it right then! 😬🤦♀️ #funding @MCR_SSM http…
Months of planning and writing...for a 10-minute decision. No pressure to get it right then! 😬🤦♀️ #funding @MCR_SSM https://t.co/1H05wYXyvr
Menos de 10 minutos para discutir el futuro de una persona, así todo se reduce a sumar los #impactfacotrs. La #gestión de la #ciencia debe hacerse mucho más abierta y transparente... científica. https://t.co/UzUOG8gjIr
RT @Research_Voice: Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’…
RT @Research_Voice: Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’…
Breaking news! "There is on average less than 10 min for discussing an application—proposed project and the applicants’ CV" https://t.co/FAHlugpA4l @ERC_Research #science #funding #ECRchat
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
RT @Research_Voice: "What lies behind this negative strategy of getting rid of applications? (1) the enormous selection pressure as there i…
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
RT @Research_Voice: "What lies behind this negative strategy of getting rid of applications? (1) the enormous selection pressure as there i…
"What lies behind this negative strategy of getting rid of applications? (1) the enormous selection pressure as there is a very low success rate of about 10%, & (2) the enormous work load, as a panel has to process on average 100 proposals in 2–3 days"
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
RT @Research_Voice: Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than fi…
Are @ERC_Research starting grant panels focusing on rejecting applications by searching for weak points, rather than finding the high-risk/high-gain groundbreaking ideas that may be in the proposals? https://t.co/FAHlugpA4l #h2020 #peerreview #funding cc