↓ Skip to main content

BAME Staff and Public Service Motivation: The Mediating Role of Perceived Fairness in English Local Government

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
BAME Staff and Public Service Motivation: The Mediating Role of Perceived Fairness in English Local Government
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10551-018-3953-8
Authors

Wen Wang, Roger Seifert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Lecturer 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 40 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 16 18%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Psychology 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 45 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,094
of 2,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,432
of 326,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#50
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,957 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.