↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with long-term survival in central nervous system metastases

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Factors associated with long-term survival in central nervous system metastases
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2946-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernardo Cacho-Díaz, Héctor Spínola-Maroño, Alberto González-Aguilar, Oscar Arrieta

Abstract

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide; central nervous system metastases (CNSm) are amongst the most common complications of cancer and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study was to associate clinic and oncologic characteristics with the possibility of survival for ≥ 1 year. A prospective cohort in two referral centers recollected clinical and oncologic data from patients diagnosed with CNSm. Chronic metastases were defined as those patients that survived for ≥ 12 months after the diagnosis of CNSm. Of 613 patients with CNSm, 554 had solid tumors as the primary cancer and were included; 405 (73%) were women, the most common primary cancer site were breast, lung and urologic. Chronic CNSm were found in 260 (47%) and were compared to those who did not. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables associated with good prognosis (living > 12 months) were: female sex (HR 0.55), single CNSm (HR 0.39), diagnosis of CNSm during initial extension studies or during presentation of cancer (HR 0.43), and occipital location (HR 0.62). Long-term survival in patients with CNSm remains a topic of debate; their bad prognosis could be changing towards improvement. Clinical findings are typically overlooked in CNSm reports and prognostic scales. After our findings, we propose to include them in forthcoming studies to aid prognostic considerations. Factors associated with prolonged survival found in our study include female gender, timing of CNSm diagnosis, occipital lobe location, and single CNSm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,643,992
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#2,266
of 2,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,360
of 326,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#49
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.