↓ Skip to main content

Subsidized work before and after the German Hartz reforms: design of major schemes, evaluation results and lessons learnt

Overview of attention for article published in IZA Journal of Labor Policy          , December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Subsidized work before and after the German Hartz reforms: design of major schemes, evaluation results and lessons learnt
Published in
IZA Journal of Labor Policy          , December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-9004-2-16
Authors

Joachim Wolff, Gesine Stephan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 42%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 42%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 17%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Computer Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from IZA Journal of Labor Policy         
#74
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,093
of 321,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IZA Journal of Labor Policy         
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.