| Title |
Comparing the effectiveness of hyperspectral imaging and Raman spectroscopy: a case study on Armenian manuscripts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-018-0206-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian J. Maybury, David Howell, Melissa Terras, Heather Viles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 10 | 16% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,914,795
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#112
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,232
of 332,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.