Title |
Approach to the diagnosis and management of retained rectal foreign bodies: clinical update
|
---|---|
Published in |
Techniques in Coloproctology, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10151-012-0899-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
A. A. Ayantunde |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 14% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 50% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#5,964,136
of 23,545,680 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#553
of 1,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,985
of 171,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,545,680 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.