Title |
Assessing biodiversity vulnerability to climate change: testing different methodologies for Portuguese herpetofauna
|
---|---|
Published in |
Regional Environmental Change, September 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10113-015-0858-2 |
Authors |
Maria João Cruz, Elisabeth Maria Rogier Robert, Tiago Costa, David Avelar, Rui Rebelo, Mário Pulquério |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 26% |
Researcher | 8 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 22 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 26% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,636,671
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Regional Environmental Change
#569
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,569
of 266,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Environmental Change
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.