Title |
Precise Simulation of Electromagnetic Calorimeter Showers Using a Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network
|
---|---|
Published in |
arXiv, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s41781-018-0019-7 |
Authors |
Martin Erdmann, Jonas Glombitza, Thorben Quast |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 35% |
Computer Science | 4 | 20% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Energy | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,642,268
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#141,346
of 994,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,539
of 442,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#3,805
of 24,520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 994,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24,520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.