↓ Skip to main content

Calibration of a multi-anvil high-pressure apparatus to simulate planetary interior conditions

Overview of attention for article published in EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Calibration of a multi-anvil high-pressure apparatus to simulate planetary interior conditions
Published in
EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation, July 2018
DOI 10.1140/epjti/s40485-018-0047-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. S. Knibbe, S. M. Luginbühl, R. Stoevelaar, W. van der Plas, D. M. van Harlingen, N. Rai, E. S. Steenstra, R. van de Geer, W. van Westrenen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 34%
Materials Science 4 11%
Chemistry 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2018.
All research outputs
#13,043,199
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation
#16
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,795
of 328,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EPJ Techniques and Instrumentation
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.