Title |
What are Extreme Learning Machines? Filling the Gap Between Frank Rosenblatt’s Dream and John von Neumann’s Puzzle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cognitive Computation, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12559-015-9333-0 |
Authors |
Guang-Bin Huang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Turkey | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Israel | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 1% |
Unknown | 378 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 22% |
Student > Master | 77 | 19% |
Researcher | 42 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 7% |
Professor | 20 | 5% |
Other | 73 | 18% |
Unknown | 67 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 135 | 34% |
Engineering | 103 | 26% |
Mathematics | 15 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 3% |
Psychology | 8 | 2% |
Other | 35 | 9% |
Unknown | 88 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,466,608
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Computation
#69
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,461
of 264,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Computation
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.