↓ Skip to main content

Lack of emotional gaze preferences using eye-tracking in remitted bipolar I disorder

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Lack of emotional gaze preferences using eye-tracking in remitted bipolar I disorder
Published in
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40345-018-0123-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

John R. Purcell, Monika Lohani, Christie Musket, Aleena C. Hay, Derek M. Isaacowitz, June Gruber

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is associated with heightened and persistent positive emotion (Gruber in Curr Dir Psychol Sci 20:217-221, 2011; Johnson in Clin Psychol Rev 25:241-262, 2005). Yet little is known about information processing biases that may influence these patterns of emotion responding. The current study adopted eye-tracking methodology as a continuous measure of sustained overt attention to monitor gaze preferences during passive viewing of positive, negative, and neutral standardized photo stimuli among remitted bipolar adults and healthy controls. Percentage fixation durations were recorded for predetermined areas of interest across the entire image presentation, and exploratory analyses were conducted to examine early versus late temporal phases of image processing. Results suggest that the bipolar and healthy control groups did not differ in patterns of attention bias. Findings provide insight into apparently intact attention processing despite disrupted emotional responding in bipolar disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 31%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 40%
Neuroscience 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,393,670
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#126
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,979
of 342,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.