↓ Skip to main content

Perceived restoration scale method turned into (used as the) evaluation tool for parks and open green spaces, using Tartu city parks as an example

Overview of attention for article published in City, Territory and Architecture , February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Perceived restoration scale method turned into (used as the) evaluation tool for parks and open green spaces, using Tartu city parks as an example
Published in
City, Territory and Architecture , February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40410-014-0020-3
Authors

Piret Rennit, Kadri Maikov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Design 9 17%
Environmental Science 6 11%
Arts and Humanities 5 9%
Engineering 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from City, Territory and Architecture
#68
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,708
of 270,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from City, Territory and Architecture
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.