| Title |
Influence of dietary fat and carbohydrates proportions on plasma lipids, glucose control and low-grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes—The TOSCA.IT Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-015-0983-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Vitale, M. Masulli, A. A. Rivellese, A. C. Babini, M. Boemi, E. Bonora, R. Buzzetti, O. Ciano, M. Cignarelli, M. Cigolini, G. Clemente, G. Citro, L. Corsi, E. Dall’Aglio, S. Del Prato, G. Di Cianni, M. A. Dolci, C. Giordano, R. Iannarelli, C. Iovine, A. Lapolla, D. Lauro, S. Leotta, C. Mazzucchelli, V. Montani, G. Perriello, G. Romano, F. Romeo, L. Santarelli, R. Schiano di Cola, S. Squatrito, L. Tonutti, R. Trevisan, A. A. Turco, C. Zamboni, G. Riccardi, O. Vaccaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| Ireland | 2 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,401,611
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#929
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,497
of 282,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#23
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.