↓ Skip to main content

An in silico evaluation of the ADMET profile of the StreptomeDB database

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
An in silico evaluation of the ADMET profile of the StreptomeDB database
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2013
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-2-353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fidele Ntie-Kang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 8 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 21%
Chemistry 31 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 61 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,538,060
of 23,092,602 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#941
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,526
of 199,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#47
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,092,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.