@hohygen @jabbidabbadoo Her Terje - eg fant link te rapporten, og har lest. Ping meg når du har lest :) https://t.co/jV5imqGs14
@Dervish23 @baltinsky1 @OrtoDogge Не согласны? Замечательно, приводите свои исследования по консенсусу. Здесь накидаю просто несколько самых известных, чтобы было, с чего начинать https://t.co/FoFTKTxX8o https://t.co/bFbM2UbBX6 https://t.co/SJSeLh3fid
@FChecker76 @bikeack @SpreadActionUSA @craigthomler @SamLMontano Here's a link to the academic paper: https://t.co/fJ4iPSvCCE
@ny_gracie @thebadstats "Climate Change is not a scientific consensus" Ok, Karen. (And by the way, the 3% of papers who doesn't agree with it were peer-reviewed and all of them showed methodological errors) https://t.co/w0DdlIemtI https://t.co/AA5sksvt
Cerca de 97% dos estudos na área asseguram que o Aquecimento Global Antropogênico é real e os poucos estudos contrários à existência do AGA contêm aspectos em comum: erros na metodologia, na análise ou até em física básica https://t.co/0FiaVB1Zk2
Learning From Mistakes in Climate Research (2016) : Benestad, Rasmus E and Nuccitelli, Dana and Lewandowsky, Stephan and Hayhoe, Katharine and Hygen, Hans Olav and Van Dorland, Rob and Cook, John DOI: https://t.co/Nyq1B10JYm #analys #my_bibtex
@spion @nailbomb3 @profvrr This sounds familiar... https://t.co/sBEGKnGHjQ
@dannycheeko @_RealEstateGuy_ That is simply not true. Only 2-3% of actual climate studies deny climate change, and those studies either cannot be replicated, or contain errors. https://t.co/WhV7yNfyHX
RT @icandosocanu: @1000Frolly Scrutiny is bad for denial: Best avoid it mate 🤡 https://t.co/LUO98QEmVC https://t.co/1zg22iV6tW https:/…
@1000Frolly Scrutiny is bad for denial: Best avoid it mate 🤡 https://t.co/LUO98QEmVC https://t.co/1zg22iV6tW https://t.co/bViwDhZ5cB and https://t.co/ezmyWsfhh1 https://t.co/TVme3phnLf
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
@Ericson_ubbhult @patrikslimane1 @arktisk @whites_mot I sedvanlig bedräglig stil går du på person när sakfrågan går dig ur händerna. Men men. Jag litar givetvis till expertisen. Läs på här: https://t.co/pPg2HXwYoD
RT @OneManLaptop: @KathyGrants @addthis On top of that, @KHayhoe did a great breakdown of the theories and papers submitted by the .1 perce…
@KathyGrants @addthis On top of that, @KHayhoe did a great breakdown of the theories and papers submitted by the .1 percent and broke down what it was they actually put forward: https://t.co/BdUnpuDFJk
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
@CharakterZeigen Und die restlichen 0,1% scheinen fehlerbehaftet zu sein laut dieser Studie 👇
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT https://t.co/vja…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
с удовольствием прочитал. мой любимый жанр «вы все дураки» (неиронично). сам бы только в нём и выступал
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
This is pretty damning. We cannot still be asking “is climate change real?” We need to act at individual, local and global scales NOW.
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT https://t.co/vja…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
@HeyNurseKat For those sleeping in the back. 99.9% of scientists agreeing on a fact, that's pretty much a consensus right there, and it is so after the fact has been challenged, questioned, explored through different angles enough. 99.999% of time, those o
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @ExtinctionR: Today in 'Science doesn't have to produce surprising results', we learn there is effectively 100% scientific consensus tha…
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT
RT @KHayhoe: And the 0.1%? We took a look at those. Turns out every one we looked at had an error. https://t.co/N1pHmOKsPT