Title |
How the microbiome is influenced by the therapy of urological diseases: standard versus alternative approaches
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Phytoscience, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40816-017-0045-8 |
Authors |
Kurt G. Naber, Mikhail Kogan, Florian M. E. Wagenlehner, Roswitha Siener, André Gessner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 33% |
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 28% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,782,411
of 24,619,469 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Phytoscience
#18
of 68 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,829
of 314,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Phytoscience
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,619,469 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 68 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.