| Title |
The dangers of poor construct conceptualization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, June 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0092070303031003011 |
| Authors |
Scott B. MacKenzie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 448 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 159 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 67 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 13% |
| Researcher | 24 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 16% |
| Unknown | 73 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 250 | 51% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 8% |
| Psychology | 34 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 9% |
| Unknown | 87 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#353
of 849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,499
of 53,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 849 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them