↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of accuracy of synthetic waveforms for subduction-zone earthquakes by using a land–ocean unified 3D structure model

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of accuracy of synthetic waveforms for subduction-zone earthquakes by using a land–ocean unified 3D structure model
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, June 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40623-018-0871-z
Authors

Taro Okamoto, Hiroshi Takenaka, Takeshi Nakamura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 73%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Materials Science 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,432
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,481
of 341,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.