↓ Skip to main content

Boltzmann and Fokker–Planck Equations Modelling the Elo Rating System with Learning Effects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nonlinear Science, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 177)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Boltzmann and Fokker–Planck Equations Modelling the Elo Rating System with Learning Effects
Published in
Journal of Nonlinear Science, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00332-018-9512-8
Authors

Bertram Düring, Marco Torregrossa, Marie-Therese Wolfram

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,748,690
of 12,985,916 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#35
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,655
of 268,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonlinear Science
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,985,916 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.