↓ Skip to main content

Radiological identification and analysis of soft tissue musculoskeletal calcifications

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Radiological identification and analysis of soft tissue musculoskeletal calcifications
Published in
Insights into Imaging, June 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13244-018-0619-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Véronique Freire, Thomas P. Moser, Marianne Lepage-Saucier

Abstract

Musculoskeletal calcifications are frequent on radiographs and sometimes problematic. The goal of this article is to help radiologists to make the correct diagnosis when faced with an extraosseous musculoskeletal calcification. One should first differentiate a calcification from an ossification or a foreign body and then locate the calcification correctly. Each location has a specific short differential diagnosis, with minimal further investigation necessary. Intra-tendon calcifications are most frequently associated with hydroxyapatite deposition disease (HADD). In most cases, intra-articular calcifications are caused by calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystal deposition disease. Soft tissue calcification can be caused by secondary tumoural calcinosis from renal insufficiency, or collagen vascular diseases and by vascular calcifications, either arterial or venous (phlebolith). • Calcifications have to be differentiated form ossification and foreign body. • A musculoskeletal MRI study must always be correlated with a radiograph. • The clinical manifestations of calcifications may sometimes mimic septic arthritis or sarcoma. • HADD and CPPD crystal deposition have a distinct appearance on radiograph. • Calcinosis is more frequently caused by chronic renal failure and scleroderma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 12%
Student > Master 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 34 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 48%
Engineering 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,025,234
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#235
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,169
of 333,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.