The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Attributional life cycle assessment: is a land-use baseline necessary?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-015-0947-y |
| Authors |
Sampo Soimakallio, Annette Cowie, Miguel Brandão, Göran Finnveden, Tomas Ekvall, Martin Erlandsson, Kati Koponen, Per-Erik Karlsson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 46 | 38% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,811,538
of 26,385,541 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#83
of 998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,687
of 275,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.