| Title |
Growth is Good for the Poor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Economic Growth, September 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1020139631000 |
| Authors |
David Dollar, Aart Kraay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 218 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 9% |
| Mexico | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| Panama | 6 | 3% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Peru | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 113 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 185 | 85% |
| Scientists | 32 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | <1% |
| United States | 9 | <1% |
| South Africa | 6 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1048 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 209 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 190 | 17% |
| Researcher | 115 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 103 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 60 | 5% |
| Other | 209 | 19% |
| Unknown | 219 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 441 | 40% |
| Social Sciences | 215 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 67 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 91 | 8% |
| Unknown | 247 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#202,134
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Growth
#5
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130
of 49,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Growth
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them