↓ Skip to main content

Enhancement of poly(ethylene glycol) mucoadsorption by biomimetic end group functionalization

Overview of attention for article published in Biointerphases, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Enhancement of poly(ethylene glycol) mucoadsorption by biomimetic end group functionalization
Published in
Biointerphases, January 2007
DOI 10.1116/1.2422894
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathaniel D. Catron, Haeshin Lee, Phillip B. Messersmith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 36%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 26%
Materials Science 7 15%
Engineering 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 9%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 12 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,954,160
of 23,942,155 outputs
Outputs from Biointerphases
#153
of 544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,917
of 164,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biointerphases
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,942,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 544 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.