@Spragg_Perform @Captain7bag @peter__leo Agreed. Also depends what we're considering 'optimal'. Freely-chosen/optimal-RPE will usually be higher than energetically optimal (CE or GE), and both increase with workload https://t.co/4u6MIc90Kv
@spragg247 James, I touch more on this in some of the refs below, but insufficient detail of course. Yeah, there is definitely an interaction with workload & cycling experience (handwavy aggregation of mechanisms) on preferred and energetically optimal
This explains ⬇️submaximal thresholds at ⬆️cadence, while Wpeak is no different at V̇O2max Also why professionals appear more efficient at ⬆️cadences: because at the same relative intensity they produce ⬆️power ⇒ ⬆️efficient at ⬆️cadence 8/ https://t.co/0
RT @menaspaolo: No firm conclusions can be drawn about the energetically optimal cadence for cycling. #efficiency #cycling #review https://…
RT @menaspaolo: No firm conclusions can be drawn about the energetically optimal cadence for cycling. #efficiency #cycling #review https://…
No firm conclusions can be drawn about the energetically optimal cadence for cycling. #efficiency #cycling #review https://t.co/iCPfOhw0ko
No firm conclusions can be drawn about the energetically optimal cadence for cycling. #efficiency #cycling #review http://t.co/iCPfOhepsQ
No firm conclusions can be drawn about the energetically optimal cadence for cycling. #efficiency #cycling #review http://t.co/iCPfOhepsQ