↓ Skip to main content

Cytotoxicity of Dioscin and Biotransformed Fenugreek

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biological Chemistry, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 173)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Cytotoxicity of Dioscin and Biotransformed Fenugreek
Published in
Applied Biological Chemistry, August 2010
DOI 10.3839/jksabc.2010.072
Authors

Chae Hyun Yum, Hyun Ju You, Geun Eog Ji

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 36%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biological Chemistry
#34
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,968
of 103,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biological Chemistry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them