↓ Skip to main content

Decreased hormonal sensitivity after childbirth rather than the tumor size influences the prognosis of very young breast cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Decreased hormonal sensitivity after childbirth rather than the tumor size influences the prognosis of very young breast cancer patients
Published in
SpringerPlus, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1150-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masujiro Makita, Takehiko Sakai, Akemi Kataoka, Dai Kitagawa, Akiko Ogiya, Hidetomo Morizono, Yumi Miyagi, Kotaro Iijima, Kokoro Kobayashi, Takayuki Kobayashi, Ippei Fukada, Kazuhiro Araki, Shunji Takahashi, Yoshinori Ito, Naoya Gomi, Masahiko Oguchi, Mizuho Kita, Masami Arai, Futoshi Akiyama, Takuji Iwase

Abstract

There is a significant difference in the mean tumor size between very young breast cancer patients and their elder counterparts. A simple comparison may show obvious prognostic differences. We investigated the prognostic impact of age by reducing the influence of the tumor size, which is thought to be a confounding factor. We investigated 1,880 consecutive pT1-4N0-3M0 breast cancer patients treated at less than 45 years of age between 1986 and 2002 and conducted a case-control study of breast cancer subjects less than 30 years of age. Each patient (Younger than 30) was matched with a corresponding control subject (Elder counterpart) based on an age 15 years above the patient's age, a similar tumor size and a status of being within 1 year after surgery. In addition, we assessed 47 patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC). The levels of hormone receptors were measured using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), and receptor-positive cases were divided into "weakly" and "strongly" positive groups based on the median value. Years from the last childbirth (YFLC) was categorized as "recent" and "past" at the time point of 8 years. There were fewer past YFLC cases, more partial mastectomy cases, a higher rate of scirrhous carcinoma or solid-tubular carcinoma in the Younger than 30 group than in the Elder counterpart group. The rates of a PgR-negative status in the Younger than 30 and Elder counterpart groups were 45.1 and 29.9%, respectively, As for the relationship between the PgR-negative rate and YFLC, the rates of a PgR-negative status in the past YFLC, nulliparous, recent YFLC and PABC groups were 31.9, 37.7, 44.4 and 65.7%, respectively. On the other hand, the rates of strongly positive cases were 42.6, 30.2, 22.2 and 8.6%, respectively. The 10-year recurrence-free survival rates in the Younger than 30, Elder counterpart and PABC groups were 61.7, 65.6 and 54.1%, respectively. The differences between the groups were not significant. In a multivariate analysis, independent prognostic facers included the number of lymph node metastases (4-9, HR:3.388, 95% CI 1.363-8.425, p = 0.0086, over 10, HR: 6.714, 2.033-22.177, p = 0.0018), solid-tubular carcinoma (HR 3.348, 1.352-8.292, p = 0.0090), scirrhous carcinoma (HR 2.294, 1.013-5.197, p = 0.0465) and past YFLC (HR 0.422, 0.186-0.956, p = 0.0387). An age younger than 30 was not found to be an independent prognostic factor. The prognosis of the very young women was the same as their elder counterparts with a matched tumor size, and age was not identified to be an independent prognostic factor according to the multivariate analysis. Recent childbirth probably influences the prognosis of patients younger than 30 years of age with breast cancer by lowering hormonal sensitivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,284,384
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#1,461
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,509
of 263,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#94
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.