| Title |
ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-009-9195-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Vernon Odom, Michael Bach, Mitchell Brigell, Graham E. Holder, Daphne L. McCulloch, Alma Patrizia Tormene, Vaegan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 377 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 14% |
| Researcher | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 89 | 22% |
| Unknown | 52 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 26% |
| Psychology | 47 | 11% |
| Engineering | 46 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 45 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#17
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,799
of 109,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them