↓ Skip to main content

Empirical modeling of the storm time geomagnetic indices: a comparison between the local K and global Kp indices

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Empirical modeling of the storm time geomagnetic indices: a comparison between the local K and global Kp indices
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1880-5981-66-95
Authors

Jean Uwamahoro, John Bosco Habarulema

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 33%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Social Sciences 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#318
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,431
of 246,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.