| Title |
Immunogold labeling of an extracellular substance producing hydroxyl radicals in wood degraded by brown-rot fungusTyromyces palustris
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wood Science, February 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00779552 |
| Authors |
Taeko Hirano, Akio Enoki, Hiromi Tanaka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 18% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2005.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wood Science
#73
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,768
of 113,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wood Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them